What Strategies Are Used When Technology Projects Fail to Meet Objectives as a Chief Technology Officer?
CTO Sync
What Strategies Are Used When Technology Projects Fail to Meet Objectives as a Chief Technology Officer?
When a technology project fails to meet its initial objectives, it can feel like navigating uncharted waters. Insights from a CEO and a CTO provide valuable perspectives on overcoming such setbacks. The first expert suggests conducting a thorough retrospective analysis, while the last emphasizes the importance of regular communication. Discover a total of six transformative insights that turn failure into a springboard for success.
- Conduct a Thorough Retrospective Analysis
- Bring in Additional Experts
- Reassess Needs and Develop Custom Solutions
- Conduct a Thorough Post-Mortem Analysis
- Evolve Plans and Deliver Incremental Features
- Gather Information and Communicate Regularly
Conduct a Thorough Retrospective Analysis
At Software House, we encountered a situation where a technology project aimed at developing a new mobile application did not meet its initial objectives due to unexpected technical challenges and scope creep. Rather than viewing this as a failure, we saw it as an opportunity to learn and improve our processes.
First, we conducted a thorough retrospective analysis with the entire project team, including developers, designers, and stakeholders. This involved identifying what went wrong, whether it was related to unclear requirements, inadequate resource allocation, or communication gaps. We gathered feedback from everyone involved to understand their perspectives and insights. This collaborative approach not only fostered a sense of ownership but also helped us identify specific areas for improvement.
From the lessons learned, we refined our project-management approach by implementing stricter scope management and more frequent check-ins with stakeholders to ensure alignment throughout the development process. Additionally, we introduced a more-agile workflow, allowing for incremental progress and the ability to adapt to changes more effectively.
As a result of these changes, we successfully relaunched the application with enhanced features and a more user-friendly interface. The project ultimately exceeded expectations, leading to higher user engagement and satisfaction. This experience reinforced the importance of adaptability and continuous improvement, turning setbacks into valuable learning opportunities that strengthened our overall project-management framework.
Bring in Additional Experts
At Tech Advisors, we had a situation where a client's network migration project did not go as planned. The goal was to transition their infrastructure to the cloud without any downtime, but unexpected compatibility issues with legacy systems caused significant delays. As the project lead, I knew this setback could impact client operations, so the first step was to assess the situation with the team, prioritize the most critical issues, and come up with a revised plan.
I brought in additional experts from our team, including Elmo Taddeo, who is highly skilled at identifying and resolving complex system integrations. Together, we broke down the problem into manageable tasks and communicated transparently with the client, setting realistic expectations. One key lesson was to keep communication open and to focus on solutions, not just problems. In this case, our quick, thorough response helped the client feel confident that we were handling the issue.
We turned the setback into an opportunity by upgrading several systems that had previously been overlooked. This not only solved the immediate problem but also improved the client's overall infrastructure. It was a valuable reminder that when projects don't go as planned, resilience, resourcefulness, and proactive communication can turn a difficult situation into a chance to strengthen relationships and deliver better outcomes.
Reassess Needs and Develop Custom Solutions
When the technology we implemented didn't meet all of our expectations, we saw it as an opportunity to dig deeper into the gaps. Instead of viewing it purely as a failure, we took a step back to reassess our needs and what the technology was delivering. We worked closely with the vendor to push the boundaries of what was possible and, where necessary, developed custom solutions in-house to bridge those gaps. This experience reminded us that technology, while powerful, is only as effective as the continuous iteration and adaptation that follows its implementation.
Conduct a Thorough Post-Mortem Analysis
When a technology project didn't meet its initial objectives, we approached the situation as a learning opportunity to refine our strategy and improve future outcomes. In one case, we implemented new client-management software, but after launch, we faced significant adoption issues. Users found the interface unintuitive, leading to low engagement and inefficiencies.
Steps Taken to Address the Situation:
Conducted a Thorough Post-Mortem Analysis: We gathered feedback from the users to understand the root causes of the issues. It became clear that the software's interface was not user-friendly, and the initial training was insufficient.
Pivoted the Strategy: Instead of abandoning the software, we invested in customizations to make the interface more intuitive and tailored to our team's workflow. We also implemented additional training sessions and created user guides to support the transition.
Set New, Realistic Objectives: We revised the project goals based on the initial learnings, focusing on phased adoption. The new objectives included incremental improvements in user engagement and specific process optimizations.
Turning the Setback into an Opportunity:
These actions led to a gradual increase in adoption, with a 50% improvement in user engagement within three months. The experience also encouraged us to adopt a more agile approach to technology projects, emphasizing continuous feedback and iteration. This shift not only salvaged the original project but also enhanced our overall project management strategy for future technology implementations.
Evolve Plans and Deliver Incremental Features
Our technology world is changing at such an extreme pace over the past decade. The time it takes for product teams to finalize their roadmap, business plans, and yearly strategies may serve as an obstacle to technology projects, which often take a year to two years to be fully production-ready. The solution is to keep evolving your plans and feature set, master the 'problem statement,' and deliver in small 'chunks' of features vs. big-bang releases. Depending on your technology environment, this may not always be doable, but it's easier and gives you more flexibility to plan for smaller changes than larger ones, even if the small releases are all part of a long-term, big change. This is where the 'art' of Agile methodologies, and really hybrid solutions, work best—one that is morphed to your specific environment and culture. No single environment is exactly the same, and the leaders that can implement a custom set of 'best practices' for the environment they are in will be more successful. Now, as you execute your project and milestones, and discover midway that you're not meeting initial objectives based on the system and product architectures you're on, you assess what went wrong. At what phase of the Software Development Lifecycle did this start to manifest itself? How can we avoid it going forward? Depending on the root cause, you update your SDLC process slightly to insert regular milestones to avoid any 'redo' and 'misalignment' on objectives. Regular project milestone reviews and demos of current features (vs. requirements) are worth the time to meet, as discovering issues towards the end of the cycle incurs tremendous delays and costs to fix. My recommendation is 1) Ensuring everyone on the project is crystal clear on the objectives, the requirements, and what we are delivering to our customers 2) Ensuring these are well planned out through the project lifecycle 3) Milestone Reviews and demos to ensure we're staying on track for time, but also for meeting objectives so that if we find, at any time, we're starting to get 'off course,' we can better realign and change course. We often rush to 'implement,' but the time spent upfront in planning and ensuring alignment will save major project issues later on.
Gather Information and Communicate Regularly
've been designing and writing software systems for some of the largest companies now for 20 years, and there have been times where projects do not go as planned.
In my experience, the first place to start is to gather as much information as possible on what specifically isn't working and how far wide of the objective are you.
Avoiding blame and focusing on solutions is key at this stage. You can have a PM / Retro on the situation once the project is done.
Communicate quickly and often with stakeholders, holding very regular meetings to start with (daily usually) to ensure that you are getting back on track.
Break down the work required to get back on track in to as small as possible tasks and deliveries. Ensure that each task is a vertical workflow that can be shown to stakeholders and get feedback on whether this is the right direction.
Identify quick wins and implement them as fast as possible (with quality and testing still to a high standard) to start getting moral and belief back from the team and stakeholders.
Adjust timelines and expectations from all involved in the project to be realistic, so you don't disappoint twice if you fail top deliver the second time.
As time progresses, the daily meetings can become every other day, then weekly until the project is back on track and delivered.
Once the project is over, now is the time to retro the situation and see where things went wrong. In my experience, these breakdowns occur due to bad planning. Generally speaking, using an approach like the Three Amigos (a representive from Engineer, Product and QA) to define the workflows before starting any code usually gets around this problem. an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
